Mauritius vs Norfolk Island: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Mauritius
0.0%
in 2022
Norfolk Island
0.0%
in 2022
Mauritius rank
153rd
Norfolk Island rank
154th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Mauritius
- Norfolk Island
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Norfolk Island, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Norfolk Island's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 153rd and Norfolk Island ranks 154th of 168 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Norfolk Island in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Norfolk Island | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Norfolk Island |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Mauritius or Norfolk Island?
- Mauritius, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Norfolk Island as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Mauritius and Norfolk Island?
- 0.0%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Norfolk Island?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Mauritius and Norfolk Island rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Mauritius ranks 153rd and Norfolk Island ranks 154th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.