Monaco vs Timor-Leste: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Monaco
1.0%
in 2022
Timor-Leste
0.9%
in 2022
Monaco rank
66th
Timor-Leste rank
67th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Monaco
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 1.0% against 0.9% in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Monaco ahead.
Monaco ranks 66th and Timor-Leste ranks 67th of 188 countries.
Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Monaco | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.2% | 0.4% | 0.8% | Monaco |
| 2020s | 0.7% | 0.6% | 0.1% | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Monaco or Timor-Leste?
- Monaco, at 1.0% against 0.9% in Timor-Leste as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Monaco and Timor-Leste?
- 0.1%, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and Timor-Leste?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Monaco and Timor-Leste rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Monaco ranks 66th and Timor-Leste ranks 67th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.