Namibia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Namibia
1.4%
in 2022
Sao Tome and Principe
1.4%
in 2022
Namibia rank
46th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
44th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Namibia
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1.4% against 1.4% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 46th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 174 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.3% | 0.4% | 1.9% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 2.0% | 0.7% | 1.3% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Namibia or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 1.4% against 1.4% in Namibia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Namibia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.0%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Namibia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Namibia ranks 46th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.