New Zealand vs Sudan: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
New Zealand
0.6%
in 2022
Sudan
0.6%
in 2022
New Zealand rank
83rd
Sudan rank
86th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- New Zealand
- Sudan
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.6% against 0.6% in Sudan, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 83rd and Sudan ranks 86th of 174 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.9% | 0.3% | 0.7% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.6% | 0.2% | 0.4% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, New Zealand or Sudan?
- New Zealand, at 0.6% against 0.6% in Sudan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between New Zealand and Sudan?
- 0.0%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do New Zealand and Sudan rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- New Zealand ranks 83rd and Sudan ranks 86th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.