Nicaragua vs Trinidad and Tobago: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Nicaragua
2.0%
in 2022
Trinidad and Tobago
1.8%
in 2022
Nicaragua rank
32nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
34th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Nicaragua
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 2.0% against 1.8% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 32nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 34th of 174 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.6% | 3.7% | 2.1% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 4.4% | 2.6% | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Nicaragua or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Nicaragua, at 2.0% against 1.8% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Nicaragua and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.2%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Nicaragua and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Nicaragua ranks 32nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 34th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.