Nigeria vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Nigeria
0.8%
in 2022
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0.8%
in 2022
Nigeria rank
75th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
76th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Nigeria
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 0.8% against 0.8% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Nigeria ranks 75th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 76th of 174 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.1% | 2.1% | 1.0% | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2020s | 0.7% | 2.2% | 1.5% | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Nigeria or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Nigeria, at 0.8% against 0.8% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Nigeria and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.0%, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Nigeria and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Nigeria ranks 75th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 76th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.