Northern Africa vs Norway: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Northern Africa
0.4%
in 2022
Norway
2.2%
in 2022
Northern Africa rank
26th
Norway rank
27th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Northern Africa
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 2.2% against 0.4% in Northern Africa, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Norway's figure about 5.9 times Northern Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Norway ahead.
Northern Africa ranks 26th and Norway ranks 27th of 30 groups.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Africa | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.7% | 5.2% | 4.5% | Norway |
| 2020s | 0.5% | 0.9% | 0.4% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Northern Africa or Norway?
- Norway, at 2.2% against 0.4% in Northern Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Northern Africa and Norway?
- 1.8%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa and Norway?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Northern Africa and Norway rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Northern Africa ranks 26th and Norway ranks 27th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.