Norway vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing

Norway
2.2%
in 2022
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
0.0%
in 2022
Norway rank
30th
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
32nd

Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time

  • Norway
  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
0246201820202022

How they compare

Norway currently reports 2.2% against 0.0% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 2.2%.

That makes Norway's figure about 87.5 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 30th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 32nd of 202 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Difference Ahead
2010s 5.2% 0.0% 5.2% Norway
2020s 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Norway or Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
Norway, at 2.2% against 0.0% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2022.
What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Norway and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
2.2%, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
How do Norway and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
Norway ranks 30th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 32nd of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-anomaly-remote-sensing-percent/norway/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/chlorophyll-a-anomaly-remote-sensing-percent/norway/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/">Norway vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%)
Unit
%
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
234 places, 1,170 data points, 2018–2022
Last refreshed