Norway vs Oceania: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Norway
2.2%
in 2022
Oceania
0.3%
in 2022
Norway rank
28th
Oceania rank
30th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Norway
- Oceania
How they compare
Norway currently reports 2.2% against 0.3% in Oceania, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Norway's figure about 6.2 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 28th and Oceania ranks 30th of 188 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.2% | 0.3% | 4.9% | Norway |
| 2020s | 0.9% | 0.4% | 0.5% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Norway or Oceania?
- Norway, at 2.2% against 0.3% in Oceania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Norway and Oceania?
- 1.9%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Oceania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Norway and Oceania rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Norway ranks 28th and Oceania ranks 30th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.