Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Sweden: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
0.0%
in 2022
Sweden
1.8%
in 2022
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
32nd
Sweden rank
37th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 1.8% against 0.0% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Sweden's figure about 74.6 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 32nd and Sweden ranks 37th of 32 groups.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0% | 7.1% | 7.1% | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 2.2% | 2.1% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 1.8% against 0.0% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Sweden?
- 1.8%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Sweden rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 32nd and Sweden ranks 37th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.