Philippines vs Saint Pierre and Miquelon: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Philippines
0.3%
in 2022
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
0.3%
in 2022
Philippines rank
112th
Saint Pierre and Miquelon rank
114th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Philippines
- Saint Pierre and Miquelon
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 0.3% against 0.3% in Saint Pierre and Miquelon, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.2 times Saint Pierre and Miquelon's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Saint Pierre and Miquelon ahead.
Philippines ranks 112th and Saint Pierre and Miquelon ranks 114th of 174 countries.
Saint Pierre and Miquelon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.4% | Saint Pierre and Miquelon |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 1.0% | 0.7% | Saint Pierre and Miquelon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Philippines or Saint Pierre and Miquelon?
- Philippines, at 0.3% against 0.3% in Saint Pierre and Miquelon as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Philippines and Saint Pierre and Miquelon?
- 0.0%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Saint Pierre and Miquelon?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Philippines and Saint Pierre and Miquelon rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Philippines ranks 112th and Saint Pierre and Miquelon ranks 114th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.