Pitcairn vs Polynesia: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Pitcairn
0.0%
in 2022
Polynesia
0.0%
in 2022
Pitcairn rank
157th
Polynesia rank
155th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Pitcairn
- Polynesia
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Pitcairn, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Pitcairn's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Polynesia ahead.
Pitcairn ranks 157th and Polynesia ranks 155th of 188 countries.
Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pitcairn | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Pitcairn or Polynesia?
- Polynesia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Pitcairn as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Pitcairn and Polynesia?
- 0.0%, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pitcairn and Polynesia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Pitcairn and Polynesia rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Pitcairn ranks 157th and Polynesia ranks 155th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.