South Africa vs Timor-Leste: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
South Africa
0.9%
in 2022
Timor-Leste
0.9%
in 2022
South Africa rank
72nd
Timor-Leste rank
73rd
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- South Africa
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.9% against 0.9% in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 72nd and Timor-Leste ranks 73rd of 204 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.4% | 0.4% | 1.0% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 1.5% | 0.6% | 0.9% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, South Africa or Timor-Leste?
- South Africa, at 0.9% against 0.9% in Timor-Leste as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between South Africa and Timor-Leste?
- 0.0%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Timor-Leste?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do South Africa and Timor-Leste rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- South Africa ranks 72nd and Timor-Leste ranks 73rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.