South Africa vs East Timor: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
South Africa
0.9%
in 2022
East Timor
0.9%
in 2022
South Africa rank
72nd
East Timor rank
73rd
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- South Africa
- East Timor
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.9% against 0.9% in East Timor, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 72nd and East Timor ranks 73rd of 202 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.4% | 0.4% | 1.0% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 1.5% | 0.6% | 0.9% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, South Africa or East Timor?
- South Africa, at 0.9% against 0.9% in East Timor as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between South Africa and East Timor?
- 0.0%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and East Timor?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do South Africa and East Timor rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- South Africa ranks 72nd and East Timor ranks 73rd of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.