South Africa vs Tunisia: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
South Africa
0.9%
in 2022
Tunisia
1.0%
in 2022
South Africa rank
62nd
Tunisia rank
59th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- South Africa
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 1.0% against 0.9% in South Africa, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 62nd and Tunisia ranks 59th of 174 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.4% | 0.9% | 0.5% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 1.5% | 0.9% | 0.6% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, South Africa or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 1.0% against 0.9% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between South Africa and Tunisia?
- 0.1%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Tunisia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do South Africa and Tunisia rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- South Africa ranks 62nd and Tunisia ranks 59th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.