Sri Lanka vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Sri Lanka
5.0%
in 2022
Sub-Saharan Africa
1.7%
in 2022
Sri Lanka rank
5th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
7th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Sri Lanka
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 5.0% against 1.7% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 3.3%.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 2.9 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 5th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 7th of 174 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 1 and Sub-Saharan Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.6% | 2.7% | 1.1% | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 2020s | 3.4% | 2.0% | 1.4% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Sri Lanka or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Sri Lanka, at 5.0% against 1.7% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Sri Lanka and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 3.3%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Sri Lanka and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Sri Lanka ranks 5th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 7th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.