Saint Lucia vs Sweden: Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing
Saint Lucia
1.8%
in 2022
Sweden
1.8%
in 2022
Saint Lucia rank
37th
Sweden rank
35th
Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing over time
- Saint Lucia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 1.8% against 1.8% in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Saint Lucia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Saint Lucia ranks 37th and Sweden ranks 35th of 188 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.6% | 7.1% | 5.5% | Sweden |
| 2020s | 1.5% | 2.2% | 0.6% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing, Saint Lucia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 1.8% against 1.8% in Saint Lucia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing between Saint Lucia and Sweden?
- 0.0%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Saint Lucia and Sweden rank globally for chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing?
- Saint Lucia ranks 37th and Sweden ranks 35th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Chlorophyll-a anomaly, remote sensing (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.