Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
27
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe
1
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
6th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
1st

Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0102030201520202025

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 27 against 1 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 26.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 27.0 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 6th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 21 groups.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher countries that are parties to the nagoya protocol, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or Sao Tome and Principe?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 27 against 1 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2025.
What is the difference in countries that are parties to the nagoya protocol between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Sao Tome and Principe?
26, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Sao Tome and Principe?
5 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2025.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for countries that are parties to the nagoya protocol?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 6th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 21 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol (1 = YES; 0 = NO). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/countries-that-are-parties-to-the-nagoya-protocol-1-yes-0-no/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/compare/countries-that-are-parties-to-the-nagoya-protocol-1-yes-0-no/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/sao-tome-and-principe/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol (1 = YES; 0 = NO)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
229 places, 1,271 data points, 2015–2025
Last refreshed