Statizoid

Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol was 27 in 2025. β–² Rising

Latest (2025)
27
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
4th
of 30 regions
All-time high
27
in 2023
All-time low
15
in 2015
Years of data
11
2015–2025

Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), 2015–2025

01020302015202020252015: 152016: 192017: 212018: 242019: 242020: 262021: 262022: 262023: 272024: 272025: 27

Source: United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database.

Analysis

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) recorded 27 for countries that are parties to the nagoya protocol in 2025. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 80.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, countries that are parties to the nagoya protocol in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) peaked at 27 in 2023 and was at its lowest, 15, in 2015.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th of 30 regions on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 20.6 15 24 5
2020s 26.5 26 27 6

Countries ranked near Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

  1. 1 Afghanistan 1 compare
  2. 1 Albania 1 compare
  3. 1 Angola 1 compare
  4. 1 Antigua and Barbuda 1 compare
  5. 1 Argentina 1 compare
  6. 1 Austria 1 compare
  7. 1 Bahamas 1 compare
  8. 1 Bahrain 1 compare
  9. 1 Bangladesh 1 compare
  10. 1 Belarus 1 compare
  11. 1 Belgium 1 compare
  12. 1 Benin 1 compare
  13. 1 Bhutan 1 compare
  14. 1 Botswana 1 compare
  15. 1 Brazil 1 compare
  16. 1 Bulgaria 1 compare
  17. 1 Burkina Faso 1 compare
  18. 1 Burundi 1 compare
  19. 1 Cambodia 1 compare
  20. 1 Cameroon 1 compare
  21. 1 Central African Republic 1 compare
  22. 1 Chad 1 compare
  23. 1 China (People's Republic of) 1 compare
  24. 1 Comoros 1 compare
  25. 1 Congo 1 compare
  26. 1 Costa Rica 1 compare
  27. 1 Croatia 1 compare
  28. 1 Cuba 1 compare
  29. 1 Czechia 1 compare
  30. 1 Denmark 1 compare
  31. 1 Djibouti 1 compare
  32. 1 Dominican Republic 1 compare
  33. 1 Ecuador 1 compare
  34. 1 Egypt 1 compare
  35. 1 Equatorial Guinea 1 compare
  36. 1 Eritrea 1 compare
  37. 1 Estonia 1 compare
  38. 1 Eswatini 1 compare
  39. 1 Ethiopia 1 compare
  40. 1 Fiji 1 compare
  41. 1 Finland 1 compare
  42. 1 France 1 compare
  43. 1 Gabon 1 compare
  44. 1 Gambia 1 compare
  45. 1 Germany 1 compare
  46. 1 Ghana 1 compare
  47. 1 Greece 1 compare
  48. 1 Guatemala 1 compare
  49. 1 Guinea 1 compare
  50. 1 Guinea-Bissau 1 compare
  51. 1 Guyana 1 compare
  52. 1 Honduras 1 compare
  53. 1 Hungary 1 compare
  54. 1 India 1 compare
  55. 1 Indonesia 1 compare
  56. 1 Ireland 1 compare
  57. 1 Japan 1 compare
  58. 1 Jordan 1 compare
  59. 1 Kazakhstan 1 compare
  60. 1 Kenya 1 compare
  61. 1 Kiribati 1 compare
  62. 1 Kuwait 1 compare
  63. 1 Kyrgyzstan 1 compare
  64. 1 Lebanon 1 compare
  65. 1 Lesotho 1 compare
  66. 1 Liberia 1 compare
  67. 1 Luxembourg 1 compare
  68. 1 Madagascar 1 compare
  69. 1 Malawi 1 compare
  70. 1 Malaysia 1 compare
  71. 1 Maldives 1 compare
  72. 1 Mali 1 compare
  73. 1 Malta 1 compare
  74. 1 Marshall Islands 1 compare
  75. 1 Mauritania 1 compare
  76. 1 Mauritius 1 compare
  77. 1 Mexico 1 compare
  78. 1 Mongolia 1 compare
  79. 1 Montenegro 1 compare
  80. 1 Morocco 1 compare
  81. 1 Mozambique 1 compare
  82. 1 Myanmar 1 compare
  83. 1 Namibia 1 compare
  84. 1 Nepal 1 compare
  85. 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 1 compare
  86. 1 Nicaragua 1 compare
  87. 1 Niger 1 compare
  88. 1 Nigeria 1 compare
  89. 1 Norway 1 compare
  90. 1 Oman 1 compare
  91. 1 Pakistan 1 compare
  92. 1 Palau 1 compare
  93. 1 Panama 1 compare
  94. 1 Peru 1 compare
  95. 1 Philippines 1 compare
  96. 1 Portugal 1 compare
  97. 1 Qatar 1 compare
  98. 1 Republic of Korea 1 compare
  99. 1 Romania 1 compare
  100. 1 Rwanda 1 compare
  101. 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 compare
  102. 1 Saint Lucia 1 compare
  103. 1 Samoa 1 compare
  104. 1 Sao Tome and Principe 1 compare
  105. 1 Saudi Arabia 1 compare
  106. 1 Senegal 1 compare
  107. 1 Serbia 1 compare
  108. 1 Seychelles 1 compare
  109. 1 Sierra Leone 1 compare
  110. 1 Slovak Republic 1 compare
  111. 1 Solomon Islands 1 compare
  112. 1 South Africa 1 compare
  113. 1 Spain 1 compare
  114. 1 Sudan 1 compare
  115. 1 Sweden 1 compare
  116. 1 Switzerland 1 compare
  117. 1 Tajikistan 1 compare
  118. 1 Togo 1 compare
  119. 1 Tonga 1 compare
  120. 1 Tunisia 1 compare
  121. 1 Turkmenistan 1 compare
  122. 1 Tuvalu 1 compare
  123. 1 Uganda 1 compare
  124. 1 Ukraine 1 compare
  125. 1 United Arab Emirates 1 compare
  126. 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 1 compare
  127. 1 Uruguay 1 compare
  128. 1 Vanuatu 1 compare
  129. 1 Zambia 1 compare
  130. 1 Zimbabwe 1 compare

See the full ranking of 217 places β†’

More development goals data for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

All data for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is countries that are parties to the nagoya protocol in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Countries that are parties to the nagoya protocol in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) was 27 in 2025, according to United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database.
What is the highest countries that are parties to the nagoya protocol recorded in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 27 in 2023.
What is the lowest countries that are parties to the nagoya protocol recorded in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was 15 in 2015.
How does Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank for countries that are parties to the nagoya protocol?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th out of 30 regions with data for 2025.
Is countries that are parties to the nagoya protocol rising or falling in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is up 80.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) data come from?
The figures come from United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as part of Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol (1 = YES; 0 = NO). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 11 observations, free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://development-goals.statizoid.com/stat/countries-that-are-parties-to-the-nagoya-protocol-1-yes-0-no/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://development-goals.statizoid.com/stat/countries-that-are-parties-to-the-nagoya-protocol-1-yes-0-no/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol (1 = YES; 0 = NO)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
217 places, 1,211 data points, 2015–2025
Last refreshed