Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
27
in 2025
South Africa
1
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
2nd
South Africa rank
1st
Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol over time
- Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
- South Africa
How they compare
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 27 against 1 in South Africa, a difference of 26.
That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 27.0 times South Africa's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 1st of 16 regions.
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher countries that are parties to the nagoya protocol, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or South Africa?
- Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 27 against 1 in South Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in countries that are parties to the nagoya protocol between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
- 26, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2025.
- How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and South Africa rank globally for countries that are parties to the nagoya protocol?
- Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 1st of 16 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol (1 = YES; 0 = NO). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.