Laos vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Percentage of bloodstream infection due … methicillin-resistant
Laos
55.9%
in 2022
Sub-Saharan Africa
46.0%
in 2022
Laos rank
6th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
6th
Percentage of bloodstream infection due … methicillin-resistant over time
- Laos
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Laos currently reports 55.9% against 46.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 9.9%.
That makes Laos's figure about 1.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
Laos ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 6th of 50 countries.
Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.0% | 16.1% | 7.2% | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 2020s | 45.3% | 48.8% | 3.6% | Sub-Saharan Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant, Laos or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Laos, at 55.9% against 46.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant between Laos and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 9.9%, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2022.
- How do Laos and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant?
- Laos ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 6th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.